Questa pagina è solo a scopo informativo. Alcuni servizi e funzioni potrebbero non essere disponibili nella tua giurisdizione.

DoubleZero Perpetual: Unpacking the Chaotic Token Launch and Circulating Supply Controversy

Introduction to DoubleZero Perpetual and Its Token Launch

The launch of DoubleZero's perpetual token (2Z) on October 2, 2025, was one of the most anticipated events in the cryptocurrency space. However, what began with high expectations quickly spiraled into controversy. Within hours of its debut, the token's price plummeted by 65%, leaving investors and the crypto community searching for answers. This article explores the key issues surrounding the launch, including discrepancies in circulating supply, market reactions, and the broader implications for the project.

Tokenomics and Circulating Supply Discrepancies

One of the most contentious issues during the DoubleZero perpetual token launch was the significant discrepancy in its circulating supply. According to the official MICA whitepaper, the initial circulating supply was set at 700 million 2Z tokens. However, leading data aggregators like CoinMarketCap reported a staggering 3.47 billion tokens in circulation at launch. This unexpected addition of 2.77 billion tokens is widely believed to have triggered a massive sell-off, causing the token's price to collapse from its peak of $1.68 to $0.4961 within hours.

The DoubleZero team has yet to provide a public explanation for the additional tokens, leaving the community frustrated and raising concerns about the project's transparency and governance.

Price Performance and Market Reaction

The market's response to the DoubleZero perpetual token launch was swift and severe. After an initial surge to $1.68, the token's value plummeted by 65%, stabilizing at $0.4961. This dramatic price drop has been largely attributed to the circulating supply discrepancy, which eroded investor confidence and triggered a wave of sell-offs.

The chaotic price action has drawn comparisons to other high-profile token launches that faced similar issues. However, the scale of the collapse has made DoubleZero's launch one of the most controversial in recent cryptocurrency history.

Private Sale and Token Unlock Schedules

In March 2025, DoubleZero successfully raised $28 million through a private sale. However, the token unlock schedule for these early investors remains unclear. Reports suggest that non-US validators who participated in a CoinList sale purchased tokens at $0.075, potentially realizing a return on investment (ROI) of over 2,140% at the token's peak price. The lack of transparency around token unlocks has added another layer of uncertainty to the project, further unsettling investors.

Exchange Listings and Partnerships

Despite the chaotic launch, DoubleZero managed to secure listings on several major cryptocurrency exchanges. The project also announced a "HODLer Airdrop" in collaboration with one of these platforms, aiming to incentivize long-term holding of the token. While these high-profile partnerships initially boosted investor confidence, they were ultimately overshadowed by the issues that plagued the launch.

Regulatory Compliance: A Rare Achievement

One of the few positive aspects of the DoubleZero project is its regulatory compliance. The project received a No-Action Letter from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a rare achievement in the cryptocurrency space. This indicates that the SEC does not intend to take enforcement action against the project, providing a level of regulatory assurance that few other crypto projects can claim.

Technical Issues and User Complaints

The launch was further marred by technical issues, including delays in token distribution and problems with the platform's functionality. Many users took to social media to express their frustrations, citing a lack of communication from the DoubleZero team as a major concern. These technical challenges compounded the negative sentiment surrounding the project and further eroded trust among its community.

Community Sentiment and Social Media Reactions

The crypto community's reaction to the DoubleZero perpetual token launch has been overwhelmingly negative. Social media platforms were inundated with complaints about the circulating supply discrepancy, technical issues, and the team's lack of transparency. The absence of a public statement from the DoubleZero team has only fueled speculation and frustration among investors, further damaging the project's reputation.

Corporate Structure and Transparency Concerns

DoubleZero's corporate structure includes entities registered in Panama, the Cayman Islands, and the British Virgin Islands. While such arrangements are common in the cryptocurrency industry, they have raised questions about the project's transparency and governance. Critics argue that the use of offshore jurisdictions could complicate efforts to hold the project accountable for its actions, further undermining investor confidence.

Potential ROI for Early Investors

For early investors who purchased 2Z tokens at $0.075 during the CoinList sale, the potential ROI at the token's peak price of $1.68 was over 2,140%. However, the subsequent price collapse has significantly diminished these gains, highlighting the inherent risks of investing in newly launched tokens. This serves as a stark reminder of the volatility and unpredictability of the cryptocurrency market.

Comparison to Other Token Launches

The chaotic launch of the DoubleZero perpetual token has drawn comparisons to other high-profile token launches that faced similar challenges. However, the scale of the circulating supply discrepancy and the lack of communication from the DoubleZero team have set this launch apart as one of the most controversial in recent memory. These issues underscore the importance of transparency and effective communication in building investor trust.

Long-Term Implications for DoubleZero

The long-term implications of the launch failure on DoubleZero's reputation and future prospects remain uncertain. While the project has achieved notable milestones, such as securing a No-Action Letter from the SEC and forming high-profile partnerships, the issues surrounding the launch have cast a shadow over its credibility. Moving forward, the DoubleZero team must address the circulating supply discrepancy, improve transparency, and rebuild trust with its community to ensure the project's success.

Conclusion

The launch of the DoubleZero perpetual token serves as a cautionary tale for the cryptocurrency industry. Despite its high-profile partnerships and regulatory achievements, the project failed to deliver a smooth and transparent launch, leading to significant market turmoil and community backlash. As the cryptocurrency space continues to evolve, the lessons learned from DoubleZero's launch will undoubtedly shape the strategies of future projects.

Disclaimer
Questo contenuto è fornito esclusivamente a scopo informativo e potrebbe riguardare prodotti non disponibili nella tua area geografica. Non ha lo scopo di fornire (i) consulenza in materia di investimenti o una raccomandazione in materia di investimenti; (ii) un'offerta o un sollecito all'acquisto, alla vendita, o detenzione di asset/criptovalute digitali, o (iii) consulenza finanziaria, contabile, legale, o fiscale. La detenzione di asset/criptovalute digitali, comprese le stablecoin, comporta un alto grado di rischio e può fluttuare notevolmente. Dovresti valutare attentamente se il trading o la detenzione di asset/criptovalute digitali è adatto a te alla luce della tua condizione finanziaria. Consulta il tuo consulente legale/fiscale/investimento per domande sulle tue circostanze specifiche. Le informazioni (compresi dati sul mercato e informazioni statistiche, se presenti) disponibili in questo post sono fornite esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Sebbene sia stata prestata la massima cura nella preparazione di questi dati e grafici, non si accetta alcuna responsabilità per eventuali errori di fatto o omissioni in essi contenuti.© 2025 OKX. Il presente articolo può essere riprodotto o distribuito nella sua interezza, oppure è possibile utilizzarne degli estratti di massimo 100 parole, purché tale uso non sia commerciale. Qualsiasi riproduzione o distribuzione dell'intero articolo deve inoltre indicare in modo ben visibile: "Questo articolo è © 2025 OKX e viene utilizzato con autorizzazione". Gli estratti consentiti devono citare il titolo dell'articolo e includere l'attribuzione, ad esempio "Titolo articolo, [nome dell'autore, se applicabile], © 2025 OKX". Alcuni contenuti possono essere generati o assistiti da strumenti di intelligenza artificiale (IA). Non sono consentite opere derivate né altri utilizzi di questo articolo.